On 05 Dec 2006 09:29:52 +0200
Andrew Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi Stephen,
>
> > Use netdev_alloc_skb instead. It sets skb->dev so you don't have to.
>
> netdev_alloc_skb() seems to cause 2 function calls [__netdev_alloc_skb()
> and __alloc_skb()], instead of just 1 for the dev_alloc_s
hi Stephen,
> Use netdev_alloc_skb instead. It sets skb->dev so you don't have to.
netdev_alloc_skb() seems to cause 2 function calls [__netdev_alloc_skb()
and __alloc_skb()], instead of just 1 for the dev_alloc_skb() case.
It might be more efficient if the driver manually sets skb->dev.
> Sett
Andrew Victor wrote:
A minor fix to the Atmel AT91RM9200 Ethernet driver.
1. Use dev_alloc_skb() instead of alloc_skb().
2. It is not necessary to adjust skb->len manually.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK patch content
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On 04 Dec 2006 14:50:24 +0200
Andrew Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A minor fix to the Atmel AT91RM9200 Ethernet driver.
>
> 1. Use dev_alloc_skb() instead of alloc_skb().
> 2. It is not necessary to adjust skb->len manually.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> d
A minor fix to the Atmel AT91RM9200 Ethernet driver.
1. Use dev_alloc_skb() instead of alloc_skb().
2. It is not necessary to adjust skb->len manually.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN linux-2.6.19-final.orig/drivers/net/arm/at91_ether.c
linux-2.6.19-final/drivers/ne
