From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:35:55 -0800
> I will be glad to get this working. Is there any point in doing the a
> small systems version as well?
Not at this time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a messa
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:06:57 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:32 +0100
>
> > The idea was to have a selective flush of route cache entries when
> > a fib insert/delete happened. From what I remember you
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:32 +0100
> The idea was to have a selective flush of route cache entries when
> a fib insert/delete happened. From what I remember you added another/
> better solution. Just a list with route cache entries pointing to parent
David Miller writes:
> > The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
> > because currently it is set but never used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I suspect Robert wanted to play around with some generation
> ID optimizations but never
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:45:15 -0800
> The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
> because currently it is set but never used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied.
I suspect Robert wanted to play around
The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
because currently it is set but never used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:18:34.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:26:34.0 -0800
@@
