Re: [PATCH 2/9] [TCP] FRTO: remove unnecessary fackets/sacked_out recounting

2007-05-31 Thread David Miller
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:35:55 +0300 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > F-RTO does not touch SACKED_ACKED bits at all, so there is no > need to recount them in tcp_enter_frto_loss. After removal of > the else branch, nested

[PATCH 2/9] [TCP] FRTO: remove unnecessary fackets/sacked_out recounting

2007-05-26 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
From: =?ISO-8859-1?q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> F-RTO does not touch SACKED_ACKED bits at all, so there is no need to recount them in tcp_enter_frto_loss. After removal of the else branch, nested ifs can be combined. This must also reset sacked_out when SACK is not in use as TCP could