On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 05:56:54AM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> > > Isn't it a little too confusing to have two headers with the same name,
> > > one in drivers/net and one in include/linux?
> >
> > Perhaps we can fold the drivers/net one into drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c?
> > Since nothing else
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Isn't it a little too confusing to have two headers with the same name,
> > one in drivers/net and one in include/linux?
>
> Perhaps we can fold the drivers/n
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Move the mv643xx's ethernet-related register definitions from
> > include/linux/mv643xx.h into drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.h, since
> > they aren't of any use outside the ethernet driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:10:10AM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Move the mv643xx's ethernet-related register definitions from
> include/linux/mv643xx.h into drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.h, since
> they aren't of any use outside the ethernet driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROT
Move the mv643xx's ethernet-related register definitions from
include/linux/mv643xx.h into drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.h, since
they aren't of any use outside the ethernet driver.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Tzachi Perelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/dri
