On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:09:06AM +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> Would it be acceptable if I hint on such "bridge" patches in the
> futture or should we create a clean patch sequence? The latter would
> require us to rewrite patches manually.
I was mostly just poking fun at you. :-) Still, I sup
On 06-08-02 17:58 John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:43:31PM +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> > From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > We'll be needing these at some point...
>
> This one doesn't really seem like a fix. But since the later fixes
> seem to depend on it, I
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:43:31PM +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We'll be needing these at some point...
This one doesn't really seem like a fix. But since the later fixes
seem to depend on it, I guess it makes sense to take it.
I just didn't want you
From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We'll be needing these at some point...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Kunitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.h |4 +++-
drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c |6 --
2 files
