Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:39:55AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:18:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
> > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
> > >> These two functions are the same ex
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:18:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
> >> These two functions are the same except for what they call
> >> to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket.
> >>
> >
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
>> These two functions are the same except for what they call
>> to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket.
>>
>> This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> Good stuff!
>
> Yesterday I wa
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:01:53 -0200
> Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
> > These two functions are the same except for what they call
> > to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket.
> >
> > This saves half
From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:32:09 +0300
> These two functions are the same except for what they call
> to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket.
>
> This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 582/-1128 (-
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
> These two functions are the same except for what they call
> to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket.
>
> This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
Good stuff!
Yesterday I was perusing tcp_hash and I think we could have
These two functions are the same except for what they call
to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket.
This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 582/-1128 (-546)
function old new delta
__inet_hash_connect
