Re: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] rose_get_route() template

2008-01-15 Thread Bernard Pidoux
Hi, I wrote a "simplified" get_route() function. It is declared as static following judicious Eric's remark. Then, the following patch of include/net/rose.h is no more necessary. A new commit for rose_get_route() will be presented in next message. Thank you Eric for pushing me to reexamine my

Re: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] rose_get_route() template

2008-01-12 Thread Bernard Pidoux
Eric Dumazet wrote: Bernard Pidoux a écrit : From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] template declaration for rose_get_route() Signed-off-by: Bernard Pido

Re: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] rose_get_route() template

2008-01-12 Thread Eric Dumazet
Bernard Pidoux a écrit : From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] template declaration for rose_get_route() Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] rose_get_route() template

2008-01-12 Thread Bernard Pidoux
From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] template declaration for rose_get_route() Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/net/rose.h |