On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:20:11PM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/2021 9:35 PM, Eli Cohen wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 04:29:23AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> > > The mlx_features denotes the capability for which
> > > set of virtio features is supported by device. In
> > > principle,
On 2/7/2021 9:35 PM, Eli Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 04:29:23AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
The mlx_features denotes the capability for which
set of virtio features is supported by device. In
principle, this field needs not be cleared during
virtio device reset, as this capability is st
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 04:29:23AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> The mlx_features denotes the capability for which
> set of virtio features is supported by device. In
> principle, this field needs not be cleared during
> virtio device reset, as this capability is static
> and does not change across re
On 2021/2/6 下午8:29, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
The mlx_features denotes the capability for which
set of virtio features is supported by device. In
principle, this field needs not be cleared during
virtio device reset, as this capability is static
and does not change across reset.
In fact, the current c
The mlx_features denotes the capability for which
set of virtio features is supported by device. In
principle, this field needs not be cleared during
virtio device reset, as this capability is static
and does not change across reset.
In fact, the current code may have the assumption
that mlx_featu
