Quoting walter harms :
Am 20.10.2017 18:06, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
Hi Walter,
Quoting walter harms :
Am 19.10.2017 19:27, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
This code was tested
Hello all.
My original response just went to Gustavo and Walter because I'm not much of a
kernel hacker these days; it was mainly observations that may or may not have
been helpful and I'm not a regular list contributor. Looks like I shouldn't
have been so shy!
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:54:0
Am 20.10.2017 18:06, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Quoting walter harms :
>
>> Am 19.10.2017 19:27, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
>>> Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
>>> ---
>>> This code was test
Hi Walter,
Quoting walter harms :
Am 19.10.2017 19:27, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
net/netrom/nr_route.c | 63
+++
Am 19.10.2017 19:27, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
> Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
> ---
> This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
>
> net/netrom/nr_route.c | 63
> -
Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
net/netrom/nr_route.c | 63 ---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 43 dele
