On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:19:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 4:24:36 PM CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:06:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
> > > and it is highly unl
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 11:57:36 PM CET Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 23:25 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > As far as I'm concerned, we are totally fine as long as there exists a
> > longterm supported kernel that has i4l in drivers/staging.
>
> Or in drivers/isdn, right?
Right, I
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 23:25 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, we are totally fine as long as there exists a
> longterm supported kernel that has i4l in drivers/staging.
Or in drivers/isdn, right?
Paul Bolle
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:54:19 PM CET Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 22:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > isdn: move isdnhdlc out of i4l
> > isdn: i4l: move hisax driver to staging
> > isdn: move i4l to staging
> >
> > I can post those as well, at least I think the first two are
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 22:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Sounds good to me. My original series contained four more patches that
> I did not post again after there was some concern[1] that we did not
> come to a conclusion on:
>
> isdn: gigaset: remove i4l code
Let me repeat that I'm fine with a
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 4:24:36 PM CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:06:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
> > and it is highly unlikely that anyone is actually still using them
> > on modern kernels, i
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:06:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
> and it is highly unlikely that anyone is actually still using them
> on modern kernels, if at all.
>
> All three drivers apparently are for hardware that predates PC
Am 07.03.2016 um 07:57 schrieb Holger Schurig:
> I know that in Germany a good amount of land-line telephone line are
> still using ISDN. [...]
> Especially company line are using ISDN still, and there are some Linux
> programs that act on then, e.g. Asterisk and derived PBX software has
> ISDN sup
Am 10.03.2016 um 17:41 schrieb i...@linux-pingi.de:
> Am 10.03.2016 um 13:58 schrieb Paul Bolle:
>> On do, 2016-03-10 at 11:53 +0100, i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
>>> mISDN with CAPI support works just fine with pppd and pppdcapiplugin
>>> and the CAPI works for all mISDN HW.
>>
>> In the mainline tr
Am 10.03.2016 um 13:58 schrieb Paul Bolle:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> On do, 2016-03-10 at 11:53 +0100, i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
>> mISDN with CAPI support works just fine with pppd and pppdcapiplugin
>> and the CAPI works for all mISDN HW.
>
> In the mainline tree the mISDN and CAPI stacks are effectiv
Hi Karsten,
On do, 2016-03-10 at 11:53 +0100, i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
> mISDN with CAPI support works just fine with pppd and pppdcapiplugin
> and the CAPI works for all mISDN HW.
In the mainline tree the mISDN and CAPI stacks are effectively separate.
Do you perhaps refer to a mISDN + Asteris
Am 09.03.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
> Am 07.03.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Paul Bolle:
>> On za, 2016-03-05 at 14:08 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>> As a consequence, owners of HiSAX type adapters are in fact stuck with
>>> the old hisax driver if they want to continue using i4l userspace
>>>
Am 07.03.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On za, 2016-03-05 at 14:08 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> As a consequence, owners of HiSAX type adapters are in fact stuck with
>> the old hisax driver if they want to continue using i4l userspace
>> tools.
>
> Do you know whether or not mISDN tools o
On za, 2016-03-05 at 14:08 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> As a consequence, owners of HiSAX type adapters are in fact stuck with
> the old hisax driver if they want to continue using i4l userspace
> tools.
Do you know whether or not mISDN tools offer functionality comparable to
i4l tools?
Paul B
On vr, 2016-03-04 at 17:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A third patch moves the capidrv source from drivers/isdn/capi/
> into the i4l directory.
I see. Why exactly?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
I know that in Germany a good amount of land-line telephone line are
still using ISDN. Some telco company try to move people to IP only, but
this is currently still a process.
Especially company line are using ISDN still, and there are some Linux
programs that act on then, e.g. Asterisk and derive
Am 04.03.2016 um 17:18 schrieb Paul Bolle:
> [Added Tilman and Christoph.]
>
> On vr, 2016-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I actually did more patches that I ended up not submitting:
>>
>> * move hisax to staging
>> * remove i4l support from gigaset
>
> For the record: I have no rea
Hi Arnd,
[auto build test WARNING on staging/staging-testing]
[also build test WARNING on v4.5-rc6 next-20160304]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Arnd-Bergmann/isdn-icn-remove-a
On Friday 04 March 2016 19:18:49 i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
> Am 04.03.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Thursday 03 March 2016 09:30:38 i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
> >> Hi Arnd,
> >> I fully agree and ack.
> >> Thanks for the work.
> >>
> >
> > I actually did more patches that I ended up
Am 04.03.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Thursday 03 March 2016 09:30:38 i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>> I fully agree and ack.
>> Thanks for the work.
>>
>
> I actually did more patches that I ended up not submitting:
>
> * move hisax to staging
> * remove i4l support from gi
On Friday 04 March 2016 17:18:23 Paul Bolle wrote:
> [Added Tilman and Christoph.]
>
> On vr, 2016-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I actually did more patches that I ended up not submitting:
> >
> > * move hisax to staging
> > * remove i4l support from gigaset
>
> For the record:
[Added Tilman and Christoph.]
On vr, 2016-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I actually did more patches that I ended up not submitting:
>
> * move hisax to staging
> * remove i4l support from gigaset
For the record: I have no reason to object a patch that does that. (I'm
not aware any
On Thursday 03 March 2016 09:30:38 i...@linux-pingi.de wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> I fully agree and ack.
> Thanks for the work.
>
I actually did more patches that I ended up not submitting:
* move hisax to staging
* remove i4l support from gigaset
* move i4l core to staging
while I initially thought t
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:22:22PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:06:46 +0100
>
> > The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
> > and it is highly unlikely that anyone is actually still using them
> > on modern kernels, if at a
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:06:46 +0100
> The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
> and it is highly unlikely that anyone is actually still using them
> on modern kernels, if at all.
>
> All three drivers apparently are for hardware that predates PCI
>
Hi Arnd,
I fully agree and ack.
Thanks for the work.
Am 02.03.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
> and it is highly unlikely that anyone is actually still using them
> on modern kernels, if at all.
>
> All three drivers apparent
The icn, act2000 and pcbit drivers are all for very old hardware,
and it is highly unlikely that anyone is actually still using them
on modern kernels, if at all.
All three drivers apparently are for hardware that predates PCI
being the common connector, as they are ISA-only and active
PCI ISDN ca
27 matches
Mail list logo
