On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 09:24:27AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:15 -0800 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Hello again!
> >
> > This is a speculative patch that as far as I can tell is not yet required.
> > If anyone applies RCU to a data structure allocated out of an array,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:15 -0800 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> This is a speculative patch that as far as I can tell is not yet required.
> If anyone applies RCU to a data structure allocated out of an array, using
> array indexes in place of pointers to link the array elements tog
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 09:02:09AM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:05:15PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello again!
> >
> > This is a speculative patch that as far as I can tell is not yet required.
> > If anyone applies RCU to a data structure allocated out of a
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:09 +0530 Gautham R Shenoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > /**
> > + * rcu_assign_index - assign (publicize) a index of a newly
> > + * initialized array elementg that will be dereferenced by RCU
>
>
> I hope Andrew got that one while porti
Hello again!
This is a speculative patch that as far as I can tell is not yet required.
If anyone applies RCU to a data structure allocated out of an array, using
array indexes in place of pointers to link the array elements together,
then the rcu_assign_index() function in this patch will be need
