From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:53:05 +0100
> Currently all network protocols need to call dev_ioctl as the default
> fallback in their ioctl implementations. This patch adds a fallback
> to dev_ioctl to sock_ioctl if the protocol returned -ENOIOCTLCMD.
> Thi
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:17:11AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> There's something wrong with this new `return' statement.
> On my screen it looks like a 'diamond' character instead
> of a minus sign -- a character with code 0xAD ;)
That's true. Due to some funky terminal interactions I had thi
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currently all network protocols need to call dev_ioctl as the default
fallback in their ioctl implementations. This patch adds a fallback
to dev_ioctl to sock_ioctl if the protocol returned -ENOIOCTLCMD.
This way all the procotol ioctl handlers can be simplified and we d
Currently all network protocols need to call dev_ioctl as the default
fallback in their ioctl implementations. This patch adds a fallback
to dev_ioctl to sock_ioctl if the protocol returned -ENOIOCTLCMD.
This way all the procotol ioctl handlers can be simplified and we don't
need to export dev_ioc