Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a reason why dev->mem_{start/end} should not be removed ?
Is there a reason why it should? Is it going to be obsolete?
It is slowly obsoleting for a few years (don't laugh...). It is preferred
to store the relevant addre
Quoting Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Is there a reason why dev->mem_{start/end} should not be removed ?
> >
> > Is there a reason why it should? Is it going to be obsolete?
>
> It is slowly obsoleting for a few years (don't laugh...). It is preferred
> to store the relevant address in
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 23:36 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
>
> > > @@ -208,8 +205,8 @@ static int orinoco_pci_init_one(struct p
> > > priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > card = priv->card;
> > > card->pci_ioaddr = pci_ioaddr;
> > > - dev->mem_start = pci_iorang
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 23:36 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> > @@ -208,8 +205,8 @@ static int orinoco_pci_init_one(struct p
> > priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > card = priv->card;
> > card->pci_ioaddr = pci_ioaddr;
> > - dev->mem_start = pci_iorange;
> > - dev->mem_end = pci_iorange + p
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c
> index e57e92b..75df90f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c
> @@ -170,9 +170,7 @@ static int orinoco_pci_init_
From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco_pci.c
index e57e
