Roel Kluin wrote:
> Kok, Auke wrote:
>
>> Ack this e1000e change here!
>
>> (PS since there was only 1 netdriver patch here and the rest is wireless, I
>> would
>> have suggested splitting this patch up in two and sending them to the
>> wireless
>> maintainer and netdevice maintainer separately
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Ack this e1000e change here!
> (PS since there was only 1 netdriver patch here and the rest is wireless, I
> would
> have suggested splitting this patch up in two and sending them to the wireless
> maintainer and netdevice maintainer separately. But I'm sure this will get
> p
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:07:10 +0200
Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few patches with changes to net code. I have sent these to the lkml
> previously, but they were not yet merged. I am fairly new to kernel
> programming, so it is possible that I make some mistakes. I'll explain my
> rati
Roel Kluin wrote:
> A few patches with changes to net code. I have sent these to the lkml
> previously, but they were not yet merged. I am fairly new to kernel
> programming, so it is possible that I make some mistakes. I'll explain my
> rationale, please nack if incorrect, an additional bit of ex
A few patches with changes to net code. I have sent these to the lkml
previously, but they were not yet merged. I am fairly new to kernel
programming, so it is possible that I make some mistakes. I'll explain my
rationale, please nack if incorrect, an additional bit of explanation is
appreciated e
