Hi Robert,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc8 next-20190904]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commi
> > It actually has nothing to do with PHY to PHY connections. You can
> > use
> > pause frames with direct MAC to MAC connections. PHY auto-negotiation
> > is one way to indicate both ends support it, but there are also other
> > ways. e.g.
> >
> > ethtool -A|--pause devname [autoneg on|off] [rx
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 00:52 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > It is not just for broadcast storm protection. The original issue
> > that
> > made me look in to all of this turned out to be rx descritor ring
> > buffer exhaustion due to the CPU not being able to keep up with
> > packet
> > reception.
>
> It is not just for broadcast storm protection. The original issue that
> made me look in to all of this turned out to be rx descritor ring
> buffer exhaustion due to the CPU not being able to keep up with packet
> reception.
Pause frames does not really solve this problem. The switch will at
som
Hi Robert,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc8 next-20190904]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Rob
On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 10:16 +0100, Robert Beckett wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:29 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 9/10/19 11:26 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Robert Beckett wrote:
> > > > This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to
>
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:29 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 9/10/19 11:26 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Robert Beckett wrote:
> > > This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to
> > > prioritise
> > > packet delivery over throughput.
> >
> > I
On 9/10/19 11:26 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Robert Beckett wrote:
>> This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to prioritise
>> packet delivery over throughput.
>
> I don't think we can unconditionally enable this. It is a big
> behaviour change
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Robert Beckett wrote:
> This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to prioritise
> packet delivery over throughput.
I don't think we can unconditionally enable this. It is a big
behaviour change, and it is likely to break running systems. It ha
On 9/10/19 8:41 AM, Robert Beckett wrote:
> Configure autoneg for phy connected CPU ports.
> This allows us to use autoneg between the CPU port's phy and the link
> partner's phy.
> This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to prioritise
> packet delivery over throughput.
s/autoneg/au
Hi Robert,
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:41:47 +0100, Robert Beckett
wrote:
> Configure autoneg for phy connected CPU ports.
> This allows us to use autoneg between the CPU port's phy and the link
> partner's phy.
> This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to prioritise
> packet delivery
Configure autoneg for phy connected CPU ports.
This allows us to use autoneg between the CPU port's phy and the link
partner's phy.
This enables us to negoatiate pause frame transmission to prioritise
packet delivery over throughput.
Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett
---
net/dsa/port.c | 10
12 matches
Mail list logo
