(Ab)using rt6_lock wouldn't work anymore if rt6_lock is
converted into a per table lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/route.c
===
--- net-2.6.19.orig/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ net-2.6.19/net/ip
David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:01 +0200
>
>> (Ab)using rt6_lock wouldn't work anymore if rt6_lock is
>> converted into a per table lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This one looks great.
>
> Signed-off-by: D
From: Tushar Gohad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:34:03 -0700
> Are these changes scheduled to go into 2.6.18-rcX or 2.6.19?
Since the feature freeze is frozen, net-2.6.19 is where it
will likely go.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of
Are these changes scheduled to go into 2.6.18-rcX or 2.6.19?
Thanks.
- Tushar
David Miller wrote:
From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:01 +0200
(Ab)using rt6_lock wouldn't work anymore if rt6_lock is
converted into a per table lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <
From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:01 +0200
> (Ab)using rt6_lock wouldn't work anymore if rt6_lock is
> converted into a per table lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This one looks great.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
(Ab)using rt6_lock wouldn't work anymore if rt6_lock is
converted into a per table lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: net-2.6.git/net/ipv6/route.c
===
--- net-2.6.git.orig/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ net-2.6.git/net
