Satyam Sharma wrote:
On 5/8/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:31:48 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Yes, mixing select and depends is a recipe for build disasters. Call
> > me a rabid fanatic, but I would in fact go as far as to say that this
On 5/8/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:31:48 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Yes, mixing select and depends is a recipe for build disasters. Call
> > me a rabid fanatic, but I would in fact go as far as to say that this
> > whole "select" th
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tough, the kernel community has voted against you.
>
> It makes far more sense to include a driver during kernel configuration, and
> have that driver pull in its libraries via 'select'. The lame alternative
> requires developers to know which librar
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Normal dependencies, you basically have to manually make sure they are
> correct (and it seems with your patch they aren't). Again, _please_ (with
> sugar on top) don't use select unless you have a good reason for it.
You perhaps mean WAN dependency, d
On 5/8/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Yes, mixing select and depends is a recipe for build disasters. Call
> me a rabid fanatic, but I would in fact go as far as to say that this
> whole "select" thing in the Kconfig process is one big BUG, and not a
> feature.
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:31:48 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Yes, mixing select and depends is a recipe for build disasters. Call
> > me a rabid fanatic, but I would in fact go as far as to say that this
> > whole "select" thing in the Kconfig process is one big BUG, and not a
Satyam Sharma wrote:
Yes, mixing select and depends is a recipe for build disasters. Call
me a rabid fanatic, but I would in fact go as far as to say that this
whole "select" thing in the Kconfig process is one big BUG, and not a
feature. People are lazy by nature and would rather just "select" a
On 5/7/07, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > HDLC doesn't really look like simple library code, what's up with all the
> > HDLC_* options?
>
> Sub-modules.
So it's not simple library code, or
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > HDLC doesn't really look like simple library code, what's up with all the
> > HDLC_* options?
>
> Sub-modules.
So it's not simple library code, or is it?
> Anyway, what does the patch "screw" exa
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> HDLC doesn't really look like simple library code, what's up with all the
> HDLC_* options?
Sub-modules. Anyway, what does the patch "screw" exactly?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > select seriously screws with the dependencies, it's especially problematic
> > if the selected symbol has other dependencies as HDLC in this case, it makes
> > it only more complicated to get the dependencies correct again.
> > Please use it only if
Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Actually I can't see any bad idea here.
The original dependency was certainly, uhm, not the best one.
select seriously screws with the dependencies, it's especially problematic
if the selected symbol has other dependencies
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Actually I can't see any bad idea here.
> The original dependency was certainly, uhm, not the best one.
select seriously screws with the dependencies, it's especially problematic
if the selected symbol has other dependencies as HDLC in this case
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You don't have to know it's required, you can just select a driver
>> for your hardware, without enabling HDLC first.
>
> Is this a real problem?
I think the "select" is better.
> Using select you should also consider removing HDLC as visible option an
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What's the advantage? The HDLC option is directly before this?
>
> You don't have to know it's required, you can just select a driver
> for your hardware, without enabling HDLC first.
Is this a rea
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's the advantage? The HDLC option is directly before this?
You don't have to know it's required, you can just select a driver
for your hardware, without enabling HDLC first.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
Hi,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Allow enabling WAN drivers without selecting generic HDLC first,
> HDLC will be selected automatically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
> index 8897f53..3
Allow enabling WAN drivers without selecting generic HDLC first,
HDLC will be selected automatically.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
index 8897f53..3a2fe82 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/wa
18 matches
Mail list logo
