> > Adding yet another member to the already bloated tcp_sock structure to
> > implement this is too high a cost.
>
> Yes, I was worried that would be deemed too high of a cost, but it was
> the most efficient way I could think to accomplish what I wanted.
>
> > I would instead prefer that there
> Adding yet another member to the already bloated tcp_sock structure to
> implement this is too high a cost.
Yes, I was worried that would be deemed too high of a cost, but it was
the most efficient way I could think to accomplish what I wanted.
> I would instead prefer that there be some global
From: Glenn Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:47:08 -0800
> Introduce the ability to send arbitrary initial tcp timestamps that are not
> tied directly to jiffies. The basic conecpt is every tcp_request_sock and
> tcp_sock now has a ts_off offset that represents the difference
Introduce the ability to send arbitrary initial tcp timestamps that are not
tied directly to jiffies. The basic conecpt is every tcp_request_sock and
tcp_sock now has a ts_off offset that represents the difference between
tcp_time_stamp and the timestamp we send and expect to
receive.
This has th
