On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:20:32PM +0800, Junnan Wu wrote:
From: Ying Gao
In function virtio_vsock_probe, it initializes the variables
"rx_buf_nr" and "rx_buf_max_nr",
but in function virtio_vsock_restore it doesn't.
Move the initizalition position into function virtio_vsock_vqs_start.
Once e
Hi Junnan, Ying
Thank you for the contribution!
A few minor comments on the process:
I think this series is missing a cover letter, not all the maintainers
have been CCd, and you should add the tag net (because it's a fix) to
the subject. (e.g. [PATCH net 1/2]).
Here you can find some useful
From: Ying Gao
In function virtio_vsock_probe, it initializes the variables
"rx_buf_nr" and "rx_buf_max_nr",
but in function virtio_vsock_restore it doesn't.
Move the initizalition position into function virtio_vsock_vqs_start.
Once executing s2r twice in a row without
initializing rx_buf_nr an
