Re: [PATCH 1/2] rsi: Move card interrupt handling to RX thread

2020-11-10 Thread Kalle Valo
Marek Vasut wrote: > The interrupt handling of the RS911x is particularly heavy. For each RX > packet, the card does three SDIO transactions, one to read interrupt > status register, one to RX buffer length, one to read the RX packet(s). > This translates to ~330 uS per one cycle of interrupt han

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rsi: Move card interrupt handling to RX thread

2020-11-04 Thread Marek Vasut
On 11/4/20 4:21 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: On 03.11.20 19:09, Marek Vasut wrote: The interrupt handling of the RS911x is particularly heavy. For each RX packet, the card does three SDIO transactions, one to read interrupt status register, one to RX buffer length, one to read the RX packet(s).

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rsi: Move card interrupt handling to RX thread

2020-11-04 Thread Martin Kepplinger
On 03.11.20 19:09, Marek Vasut wrote: The interrupt handling of the RS911x is particularly heavy. For each RX packet, the card does three SDIO transactions, one to read interrupt status register, one to RX buffer length, one to read the RX packet(s). This translates to ~330 uS per one cycle of in

[PATCH 1/2] rsi: Move card interrupt handling to RX thread

2020-11-03 Thread Marek Vasut
The interrupt handling of the RS911x is particularly heavy. For each RX packet, the card does three SDIO transactions, one to read interrupt status register, one to RX buffer length, one to read the RX packet(s). This translates to ~330 uS per one cycle of interrupt handler. In case there is more i