From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:21:23 +0800
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm concerned it might be dangerous to load the module in
> > this context, the RTNL semaphore is held and the module we
> > are requesting could easily try to take it and d
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm concerned it might be dangerous to load the module in
> this context, the RTNL semaphore is held and the module we
> are requesting could easily try to take it and deadlock.
We shouldn't be holding the RTNL here. AFAICS we only hold
inet_diag_mutex
From: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:28:23 +0200
> By adding module aliases to inet_diag, tcp_diag and dccp_diag, we let
> them load automatically as needed. This makes tools like "ss" run
> faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Alexey Kuzne
By adding module aliases to inet_diag, tcp_diag and dccp_diag, we let
them load automatically as needed. This makes tools like "ss" run
faster.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The alias naming scheme for tcp_diag and dccp_diag follows wh
