On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:19:32 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Yeah, I agree with your initial email. The patch I submitted for that fix
> needs
> rework, which is what I tried and failed so far. I need to get back to some
> testing of my latest fix and find out what needs fixing there.
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 02:15:53PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:31:34 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > Which paths are those (my memory of this code is waning)? I thought
> > > disconnect is only called from the user space side (shutdown syscall).
> > > The o
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:31:34 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > Which paths are those (my memory of this code is waning)? I thought
> > disconnect is only called from the user space side (shutdown syscall).
> > The only other way to terminate the connection is to close the socket,
> > wh
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 01:15:54PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:09:09 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:38AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:48:28 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:09:09 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:38AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:48:28 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:30:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Tu
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:38AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:48:28 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:30:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:18:48 +0200 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> > > > From: Thad
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:48:28 -0300 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:30:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:18:48 +0200 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> > > From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > >
> > > When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:30:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:18:48 +0200 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> > From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> >
> > When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed, ccid timers may still trigger. The reason
> > del_timer_sync can't be used is becau
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:18:48 +0200 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>
> When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed, ccid timers may still trigger. The reason
> del_timer_sync can't be used is because this relies on keeping a reference
> to struct sock. But as we keep a p
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:43:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:18:48 +0200 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> > From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> >
> > When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed, ccid timers may still trigger. The reason
> > del_timer_sync can't be used is becau
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:18:48 +0200 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>
> When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed, ccid timers may still trigger. The reason
> del_timer_sync can't be used is because this relies on keeping a reference
> to struct sock. But as we keep a p
On 13/10/2020 19:18, Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>
> When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed, ccid timers may still trigger. The reason
> del_timer_sync can't be used is because this relies on keeping a reference
> to struct sock. But as we keep a pointer to dccp
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
When dccps_hc_tx_ccid is freed, ccid timers may still trigger. The reason
del_timer_sync can't be used is because this relies on keeping a reference
to struct sock. But as we keep a pointer to dccps_hc_tx_ccid and free that
during disconnect, the timer should r
13 matches
Mail list logo
