Re: [PATCH 1/2] [TCP]: Also handle snd_una changes in tcp_cwnd_down

2007-08-02 Thread David Miller
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:18:59 +0300 (EEST) > Dave, please put these two patches to net-2.6 to complete bidir fix > series. ...And please push to stable as well, take just the minimized > "fix" portion of this "[TCP]: Also handle snd_una changes in > tc

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [TCP]: Also handle snd_una changes in tcp_cwnd_down

2007-08-02 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > tcp_cwnd_down must check for it too as it should be conservative > in case of collapse stuff and also when receiver is trying to > lie (though that wouldn't be very successful/useful anyway). > > Note: > - Separated also is_dupack and do_lost in fast_

[PATCH 1/2] [TCP]: Also handle snd_una changes in tcp_cwnd_down

2007-08-01 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
tcp_cwnd_down must check for it too as it should be conservative in case of collapse stuff and also when receiver is trying to lie (though that wouldn't be very successful/useful anyway). Note: - Separated also is_dupack and do_lost in fast_retransalert * Much cleaner look-and-feel now