Re: [PATCH 1/2][XFRM]: Sub-policies beautification

2006-11-17 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-17-11 at 17:42 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > Could you maybe use u8 instead of the userspace alternative __u8? > Good catch. I think i know how i missed that one - TheLinuxWay;-> theres a few __u8s in there unrelated. So i will send an additional patch that fixes that and the rest

Re: [PATCH 1/2][XFRM]: Sub-policies beautification

2006-11-17 Thread Thomas Graf
* jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-11-17 11:49 > Good catch. I think i know how i missed that one - TheLinuxWay;-> > theres a few __u8s in there unrelated. So i will send an additional > patch that fixes that and the rest of em. Sounds good? Sure - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub

Re: [PATCH 1/2][XFRM]: Sub-policies beautification

2006-11-17 Thread Thomas Graf
* jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-11-17 09:10 > First one > > cheers, > jamal > [XFRM]: Make copy_to_user_policy_type take a type > Make copy_to_user_policy_type take a type instead a policy and > fix its users to pass the type > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > co

[PATCH 1/2][XFRM]: Sub-policies beautification

2006-11-17 Thread jamal
First one cheers, jamal [XFRM]: Make copy_to_user_policy_type take a type Make copy_to_user_policy_type take a type instead a policy and fix its users to pass the type Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- commit 5e6a47d1e7baabd38cca9d01f3d78ae1319db535 tree cb4b19b38076cdf545a