From: Xue Chaojing
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 22:32:34 +
> In rx_alloc_pkts(), there is no need to schedule a different tasklet for
> refill and it will cause some extra overhead. this patch remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Neil Horman
> Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
In future submissions please fo
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 10:32:34PM +, Xue Chaojing wrote:
> In rx_alloc_pkts(), there is no need to schedule a different tasklet for
> refill and it will cause some extra overhead. this patch remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Neil Horman
> Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet
In rx_alloc_pkts(), there is no need to schedule a different tasklet for
refill and it will cause some extra overhead. this patch remove it.
Suggested-by: Neil Horman
Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c | 23 +---
drivers/net/ethernet/hua
From: Xue Chaojing
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 19:14:19 +
> There is no need to schedule a different tasklet for refill,
> This patch remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Neil Horman
> Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
I completely agree with Neil's analysis.
You should never receive a packet if refilling t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:40:23PM +, Xue Chaojing wrote:
> There is no need to schedule a different tasklet for refill,
> This patch remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Neil Horman
> Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c | 23 +---
> driv
There is no need to schedule a different tasklet for refill,
This patch remove it.
Suggested-by: Neil Horman
Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c | 23 +---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertion
There is no need to schedule a different tasklet for refill,
This patch remove it.
Suggested-by: Neil Horman
Signed-off-by: Xue Chaojing
---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c | 23 +---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertion
