From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 05:57:24 -0800
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 00:18 -0800, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
>> dst_release should not access dst->flags after decrementing
>> __refcnt to 0. The dst_entry may be in dst_busy_list and
>> dst_gc_task may dst_destroy it before dst_release ge
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 00:18 -0800, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
> dst_release should not access dst->flags after decrementing
> __refcnt to 0. The dst_entry may be in dst_busy_list and
> dst_gc_task may dst_destroy it before dst_release gets a chance
> to access dst->flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Francesc
dst_release should not access dst->flags after decrementing
__refcnt to 0. The dst_entry may be in dst_busy_list and
dst_gc_task may dst_destroy it before dst_release gets a chance
to access dst->flags.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Ruggeri
---
net/core/dst.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
