Re: [PATCH 1/1] additional ipsec audit patch

2006-11-30 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Joy Latten wrote: > I ran a stress test overnight using labeled ipsec on a patched lspp55 kernel > using racoon last week. > > The additional patch to xfrm_state.c was my fault when rebasing to > 2.6.19-rc6 to send upstream. I plan to run an ipv4 and ipv6 stress test > tonig

Re: [PATCH 1/1] additional ipsec audit patch

2006-11-30 Thread Joy Latten
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 19:32 -0500, James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, James Morris wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Joy Latten wrote: > > > > > This patch disables auditing in ipsec when CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is > > > disabled in the kernel. > > > > > > This patch also includes a bug fix

Re: [PATCH 1/1] additional ipsec audit patch

2006-11-29 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Joy Latten wrote: > > > This patch disables auditing in ipsec when CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is > > disabled in the kernel. > > > > This patch also includes a bug fix for xfrm_state.c as a result of > > original ipsec audit patch. > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] additional ipsec audit patch

2006-11-29 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Joy Latten wrote: > This patch disables auditing in ipsec when CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is > disabled in the kernel. > > This patch also includes a bug fix for xfrm_state.c as a result of > original ipsec audit patch. > > Let me know if it looks ok. Also, the last patch contai

[PATCH 1/1] additional ipsec audit patch

2006-11-29 Thread Joy Latten
This patch disables auditing in ipsec when CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is disabled in the kernel. This patch also includes a bug fix for xfrm_state.c as a result of original ipsec audit patch. Let me know if it looks ok. My mail gateway has been acting crazy so I apologize for any replicas being sent f