Re: [PATCH 1/1] Net: kconfig, correct traffic shaper

2006-11-06 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:52:02 -0500 > ACK from me, though I think that since it relates to traffic schedulers > I think this patch should be merged through DaveM... I've merged it into my tree, thanks everyone. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Net: kconfig, correct traffic shaper

2006-11-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jiri Slaby wrote: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While you're at it .. CBQ is actually not a very good alternative since it doesn't work properly on top of virtual network devices. The closest match for an alternative would be TBF, but HTB and HFSC also do fine. Maybe just point to t

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Net: kconfig, correct traffic shaper

2006-11-05 Thread Patrick McHardy
Jiri Slaby wrote: > Ok, thanks for comments. Here it comes, please (n)ack it: > > -- > > kconfig, correct traffic shaper > > As Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> suggested, Traffic Shaper is > now obsolete and alternative to it is no longer CBQ, since its problems with > virtual devices, alter

[PATCH 1/1] Net: kconfig, correct traffic shaper

2006-11-04 Thread Jiri Slaby
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While you're at it .. CBQ is actually not a very good alternative > since it doesn't work properly on top of virtual network devices. > The closest match for an alternative would be TBF, but HTB and > HFSC also do fine. Maybe just point to the traffic sc