On 17/06/2015 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:26:26AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
>> On 15/06/2015 20:08, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:26:26AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
> On 15/06/2015 20:08, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
> >> Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
> >> private data header, add these checks to t
On 15/06/2015 20:08, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
>> Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
>> private data header, add these checks to the RDMA CM module. This allows a
>> following patch to to clean up th
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
> Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
> private data header, add these checks to the RDMA CM module. This allows a
> following patch to to clean up the ib_cm interface and remove the code that
> look
Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
private data header, add these checks to the RDMA CM module. This allows a
following patch to to clean up the ib_cm interface and remove the code that
looks into the private headers. It will also allow supporting namespaces
