On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 00:04 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/21/20 8:50 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > What about moving the default to the end if the case, which is more
> > > common anyways:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_core.c
> > > b/drivers/net/can/usb/
On 11/21/20 8:50 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> What about moving the default to the end if the case, which is more common
>> anyways:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_core.c
>> b/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_core.c
> []
>> @@ -295,16 +295,16 @@ static void peak_usb_wr
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 14:17 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/20/20 7:34 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> > through to the next case.
> >
>
On 11/20/20 7:34 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gusta
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_c
