On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:52:54PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
> > The next patch in the series changes the locking.
>
> Do you mean patch #08 ?
Sorry, looked at the wrong patch, it is #11 which changes the locking
for address register accesses.
--
Ben
Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> The next patch in the series changes the locking.
Do you mean patch #08 ?
If so it does not fix this bug: the very first line in
dm9000_phy_read includes a spinlock statement.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:50:45PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > Add support for ethtool operations for the DM9000.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.24-quilt3/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> > ==
Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Add support for ethtool operations for the DM9000.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.24-quilt3/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> ===
> --- linux-2.6.24-quilt3.orig/drivers/ne
Add support for ethtool operations for the DM9000.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.24-quilt3/drivers/net/dm9000.c
===
--- linux-2.6.24-quilt3.orig/drivers/net/dm9000.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-quilt3/drivers/net
