On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic
> should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> This cleans up a lot of unneeded code and l
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:41:57PM +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic
> > should
> > never do something
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic
> should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> This cleans up a lot of unneeded code and l
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
This cleans up a lot of unneeded code and logic around the debugfs
files, making all of this much simpler and easier
