On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
>>> + { "smc911x.0", "rx", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, -1) },
>>> + { "smc911x.0", "tx", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, -1) },
>>> + { "smc91x.0", "data", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, -1) },
>>
>> This one is
Arnd Bergmann writes:
>> + { "smc911x.0", "rx", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, -1) },
>> + { "smc911x.0", "tx", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, -1) },
>> + { "smc91x.0", "data", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, -1) },
>
> This one is interesting, as you are dealing with an off-chip device,
> and
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> +
> +static const struct dma_slave_map pxa_slave_map[] = {
> + /* PXA25x, PXA27x and PXA3xx common entries */
> + { "pxa-pcm-audio", "ac97_mic_mono", PDMA_FILTER_PARAM(LOWEST, 8) },
> + { "pxa-pcm-audio", "ac97_aux_mono_in",
In order to remove the specific knowledge of the dma mapping from PXA
drivers, add a default slave map for pxa architectures.
This is the first step, and once all drivers are converted,
pxad_filter_fn() will be made static, and the DMA resources removed from
device.c.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmi
