Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
>>>"Patrick" == Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> #define RTA_FWMARK RTA_PROTOINFO +#define RTA_FWMARK_MASK
> >> RTA_CACHEINFO
>
> Patrick> Please introduce a new attribute for this instead of
> Patrick> overloading RTA_CACHEINF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Patrick" == Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> #define RTA_FWMARK RTA_PROTOINFO +#define RTA_FWMARK_MASK
>> RTA_CACHEINFO
Patrick> Please introduce a new attribute for this instead of
Patrick> overloading RTA_CACHEI
Michael Richardson schrieb:
> [PATCH] This patch introduces a mask to the fwmark test cases in the advanced
> routing. This let's one test individual bits of the fwmark to determine
> how things should be routed (pick a routing table). This patch retains
> compatibility with tests that do not set t
Michael Richardson wrote:
> [PATCH] This patch introduces a mask to the fwmark test cases in the advanced
> routing. This let's one test individual bits of the fwmark to determine
> how things should be routed (pick a routing table). This patch retains
> compatibility with tests that do not set the
Michael Richardson wrote:
> [PATCH] This patch introduces a mask to the fwmark test cases in the advanced
> routing. This let's one test individual bits of the fwmark to determine
> how things should be routed (pick a routing table). This patch retains
> compatibility with tests that do not set the
[PATCH] This patch introduces a mask to the fwmark test cases in the advanced
routing. This let's one test individual bits of the fwmark to determine
how things should be routed (pick a routing table). This patch retains
compatibility with tests that do not set the mask by assuming a mask
of 0 is
