Re: [PATCH 01/28] bnxt_en: Add bnxt_set_max_func_irqs().

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Chan
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:47 AM, David Miller wrote: > > It really doesn't make any sense to only send 7 out of 28 of these > patches to the networking list. > > In fact I would say that you need to split this series into two > components. OK. I will resend those bnxt_en patches later today as a

Re: [PATCH 01/28] bnxt_en: Add bnxt_set_max_func_irqs().

2016-12-05 Thread David Miller
It really doesn't make any sense to only send 7 out of 28 of these patches to the networking list. In fact I would say that you need to split this series into two components. One that goes into the networking tree, and once that's accepted you can submit the IB parts to that subsystem's maintain

[PATCH 01/28] bnxt_en: Add bnxt_set_max_func_irqs().

2016-12-04 Thread Selvin Xavier
From: Michael Chan By refactoring existing code into this new function. The new function will be used in subsequent patches. Cc: David Miller Cc: Signed-off-by: Michael Chan Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 17 +++-- drivers/net/ether