From: David Howells
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 22:33:38 +
> David Miller wrote:
>
>> Can you go through and use "unsigned int" instead of just plain
>> "unsigned" in the RxRPC code?
>
> Do you mind if I leave it to after the rewrite? I don't particularly want to
> have to rejig all the patche
David Miller wrote:
> Can you go through and use "unsigned int" instead of just plain
> "unsigned" in the RxRPC code?
Do you mind if I leave it to after the rewrite? I don't particularly want to
have to rejig all the patches I have.
David
From: David Howells
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:37:05 +
> Here's the first set of patches from my RxRPC rewrite, aimed at net-next.
> These do some clean ups and bug fixes. Most of the changes are small, but
> there are a couple of bigger changes:
>
> (*) Convert call flag numbers and event
Here's the first set of patches from my RxRPC rewrite, aimed at net-next.
These do some clean ups and bug fixes. Most of the changes are small, but
there are a couple of bigger changes:
(*) Convert call flag numbers and event numbers into enums. Then rename
the event numbers to all have _
