Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric, really good job!
>
> Patches: 1-13, 15-24, 26-32, 34-44, 46-49, 52-55, 57 (all except below)
> Acked-By: Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 14/59 - minor (extra space)
> 25/59 - minor note
> 33/59 - not sorted sysctl IDs
> 45/59 - typo
>
Eric, really good job!
Patches: 1-13, 15-24, 26-32, 34-44, 46-49, 52-55, 57 (all except below)
Acked-By: Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
14/59 - minor (extra space)
25/59 - minor note
33/59 - not sorted sysctl IDs
45/59 - typo
50/59 - copyright/file note
51/59 - copyright/file name/kcon
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 09:33 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> There has not been much maintenance on sysctl in years, and as a result is
> there is a lot to do to allow future interesting work to happen, and being
> ambitious I'm trying to do it all at once :)
s390 parts look good. Kernels boots a
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 03:33, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> There has not been much maintenance on sysctl in years, and as a result is
> there is a lot to do to allow future interesting work to happen, and being
> ambitious I'm trying to do it all at once :)
>
> The patches in this series fall i
The FRV bits look okay. I can't test them until I get back from Australia in
Feb.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
>>> Agreed. *Furthermore*, if the number isn't in it shouldn't
>>> exist anywhere else, either.
>>
>> That would be a good habit. Feel free to send the patches to ensure that
>> is so.
>>
>> I'm a practical fix it when
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Agreed. *Furthermore*, if the number isn't in it shouldn't
exist anywhere else, either.
That would be a good habit. Feel free to send the patches to ensure that
is so.
I'm a practical fix it when it is in my way kind of guy ;)
That's fine. However, I am wonderin
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> With "architectural" I mean "guaranteed to be stable" (as opposed to
>>> "incidental"). Sorry for the confusion.
>>
>> Ok. Then largely we are in agreement. To implement that the rule is simple.
>> If it isn't CTL_
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
With "architectural" I mean "guaranteed to be stable" (as opposed to
"incidental"). Sorry for the confusion.
Ok. Then largely we are in agreement. To implement that the rule is simple.
If it isn't CTL_UNNUMBERED and the number is in Linus's tree, it is
our responsi
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>>> I think it would be fair to say that if they're not in
> they're
>>> not architectural, but that doesn't resolve the counterpositive (are there
>>> sysctls in which aren't architectural? From the looks of
> it, I
>>>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
I think it would be fair to say that if they're not in they're
not architectural, but that doesn't resolve the counterpositive (are there
sysctls in which aren't architectural? From the looks of it, I
would say yes.) Non-architectural sysctl numbers should not be ex
CC list trimmed.
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> - Removal of sys_sysctl support where people had used conflicting sysctl
>> numbers. Trying to break glibc or other applications by changing the
>> ABI is not cool. 9 instances of this in the kern
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
- Removal of sys_sysctl support where people had used conflicting sysctl
numbers. Trying to break glibc or other applications by changing the
ABI is not cool. 9 instances of this in the kernel seems a little
extreme.
It would be highly advantageous if we could
There has not been much maintenance on sysctl in years, and as a result is
there is a lot to do to allow future interesting work to happen, and being
ambitious I'm trying to do it all at once :)
The patches in this series fall into several general categories.
- Removal of useless attempts to ove
14 matches
Mail list logo
