On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:12:04PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> This series ignores all complete_all() usages in the firmware loading
> path. They will be hopefully address by Luis' sysdata patches [0].
> That leaves a couple of complete_all() calls.
I had not considered this as a gain, but glad
From: Daniel Wagner
Hi,
Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there
might be more than one reader. For -rt I am reviewing all
complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the
tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be
uses i
