On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:15PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 08:49:18 -0300
>
> > So this is just for pure tx path, no forwarding involved.
>
> And if that GSO segment is looped back into the stack via the
> loopback interface, the packet
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 08:49:18 -0300
> So this is just for pure tx path, no forwarding involved.
And if that GSO segment is looped back into the stack via the
loopback interface, the packet classifier mirror action, or
netfilter?
You cannot just GSO things and then
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:16:14PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:33:31 -0300
>
> > This patchset adds sctp GSO support.
> >
> > Performance tests indicates that increases throughput by 10% if using
> > bigger chunk sizes, specially if bigg
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:33:31 -0300
> This patchset adds sctp GSO support.
>
> Performance tests indicates that increases throughput by 10% if using
> bigger chunk sizes, specially if bigger than MTU. For small chunks, it
> doesn't help much if not using heavy fir
Cc'ing Xin. Sorry Xin.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 06:33:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> This patchset adds sctp GSO support.
>
> Performance tests indicates that increases throughput by 10% if using
> bigger chunk sizes, specially if bigger than MTU. For small chunks, it
> doesn't help
This patchset adds sctp GSO support.
Performance tests indicates that increases throughput by 10% if using
bigger chunk sizes, specially if bigger than MTU. For small chunks, it
doesn't help much if not using heavy firewall rules.
For small chunks it will probably be of more use once we get somet
