On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 14:31 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alex Williamson
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:33:07 -0600
>
> > I expect that's because of this patch that's in Jeff's dev-queue branch:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/commit/?h=dev-queue&id
From: Alex Williamson
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:33:07 -0600
> I expect that's because of this patch that's in Jeff's dev-queue branch:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/commit/?h=dev-queue&id=ddf766a812a13eca1116b5905e902184904266f9
>
> I based these patche
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alex Williamson
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:18:28 -0600
>
> > When running a Windows 2012 R2 guest with a pair of VFs assigned
> > through vfio-pci, we run into a problem trying to hot-unplug those VFs
> > after the PF has unregistere
From: Alex Williamson
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:18:28 -0600
> When running a Windows 2012 R2 guest with a pair of VFs assigned
> through vfio-pci, we run into a problem trying to hot-unplug those VFs
> after the PF has unregistered the netdev. This is a common scenario
> if the PF is unbound fro
When running a Windows 2012 R2 guest with a pair of VFs assigned
through vfio-pci, we run into a problem trying to hot-unplug those VFs
after the PF has unregistered the netdev. This is a common scenario
if the PF is unbound from the driver while VFs are active. In the
case of igb, the resulting
