Re: [PATCH 0/1] HW checksum offload problem on Xilinx Zynq GEM

2016-08-22 Thread Helmut Buchsbaum
On 08/19/2016 10:00 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:28 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Helmut Buchsbaum Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:04:57 +0200 When working on upgrading the v3.x kernels of our embedded devices to more recent 4.x kernels we noticed some of our proprietary netwo

Re: [PATCH 0/1] HW checksum offload problem on Xilinx Zynq GEM

2016-08-19 Thread Tom Herbert
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:28 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Helmut Buchsbaum > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:04:57 +0200 > >> When working on upgrading the v3.x kernels of our embedded devices >> to more recent 4.x kernels we noticed some of our proprietary networking >> stuff is broken. Further in

Re: [PATCH 0/1] HW checksum offload problem on Xilinx Zynq GEM

2016-08-19 Thread David Miller
From: Helmut Buchsbaum Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:04:57 +0200 > When working on upgrading the v3.x kernels of our embedded devices > to more recent 4.x kernels we noticed some of our proprietary networking > stuff is broken. Further investigations brought up an issue with small > UDP packets (data

[PATCH 0/1] HW checksum offload problem on Xilinx Zynq GEM

2016-08-19 Thread Helmut Buchsbaum
When working on upgrading the v3.x kernels of our embedded devices to more recent 4.x kernels we noticed some of our proprietary networking stuff is broken. Further investigations brought up an issue with small UDP packets (data payload <= 2), which contained wrong UDP header checksums. We tracked