From: Florian Westphal
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:37:36 +0200
> This reverts commit 3cc4949269e01f39443d0fcfffb5bc6b47878d45.
>
> There is nothing wrong with coalescing during defragmentation, it
> reduces truesize overhead and simplifies things for the receiving
> socket (no fraglist walk needed
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 01:37 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> This reverts commit 3cc4949269e01f39443d0fcfffb5bc6b47878d45.
>
> There is nothing wrong with coalescing during defragmentation, it
> reduces truesize overhead and simplifies things for the receiving
> socket (no fraglist walk needed).
>
This reverts commit 3cc4949269e01f39443d0fcfffb5bc6b47878d45.
There is nothing wrong with coalescing during defragmentation, it
reduces truesize overhead and simplifies things for the receiving
socket (no fraglist walk needed).
However, it also destroys geometry of the original fragments.
While t
