From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:53:09 +0100
> the series have some Acked-by, do you prefer a new
> series (I can rebase them if you ask me) or you can keep
> this one? Or you have some advice or issue to warn?
If it's not in an "Action Required" state in patchwork, you
can safe
Hi David,
the series have some Acked-by, do you prefer a new
series (I can rebase them if you ask me) or you can keep
this one? Or you have some advice or issue to warn?
Regards,
peppe
On 10/26/2016 8:56 AM, Giuseppe Cavallaro wrote:
This subset of patches aim to fix the PTP support
for the st
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Richard Cochran
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:56:01AM +0200, Giuseppe Cavallaro wrote:
>> This subset of patches aim to fix the PTP support
>> for the stmmac and especially for 4.x chip series.
>> While setting PTP on an ST box with 4.00a Ethernet
>> core, th
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:56:01AM +0200, Giuseppe Cavallaro wrote:
> This subset of patches aim to fix the PTP support
> for the stmmac and especially for 4.x chip series.
> While setting PTP on an ST box with 4.00a Ethernet
> core, the kernel panics due to a broken settings
> of the descriptors.
Hi Peppe,
On 10/26/2016 08:56 AM, Giuseppe Cavallaro wrote:
This subset of patches aim to fix the PTP support
for the stmmac and especially for 4.x chip series.
While setting PTP on an ST box with 4.00a Ethernet
core, the kernel panics due to a broken settings
of the descriptors. The patches re
This subset of patches aim to fix the PTP support
for the stmmac and especially for 4.x chip series.
While setting PTP on an ST box with 4.00a Ethernet
core, the kernel panics due to a broken settings
of the descriptors. The patches review the
register configuration, the algo used for configuring
t
