Hi Oliver,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems to me that irda_usb_net_open() must set self->netopen
> under spinlock or disconnect() may fail to kill all URBs, if it is called
> while an interface is opened.
Makes sense, yes.
I will push it upstream
Hi,
it seems to me that irda_usb_net_open() must set self->netopen
under spinlock or disconnect() may fail to kill all URBs, if it is called
while an interface is opened.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Regards
Oliver
--- a/drivers/net/irda/irda-us
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:45:28PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
You need to cc Samuel Ortiz and the IrDA mailing list if you
want any meaningful response.
> it seems to me that irda_usb_net_open() must set self->netopen
> under spinlock or disconnect() may fail to kil
Hi,
it seems to me that irda_usb_net_open() must set self->netopen
under spinlock or disconnect() may fail to kill all URBs.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Regards
Oliver
--- a/drivers/net/irda/irda-usb.c 2007-10-11 17:24:35.0 +0200