On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:31:03PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Artem Savkov wrote:
> > I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required
> > for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both
> > "sleeping function called from invalid context" and "po
Artem Savkov wrote:
> I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required
> for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both
> "sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular
> locking dependency detected" warnings on flush.
>
> Fix
I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required
for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both
"sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular
locking dependency detected" warnings on flush.
Fixes: ec30d78c14a8 xfrm: add xdst p
