> > Additionally, this looks like it changes the firmware API, so that
> > older firmware images will no longer work?
>
> It is backwards compatible,
> although it changes a API structure, older firmware are using only
> u16 for the field so there is no impact on that.
>
Oh, ok. I had also th
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 14:18:00, Johannes Berg wrote:
> linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: time sync : add support for 64 bit clock
>
> On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 14:12 +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> > Changed the configuratio
On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 14:12 +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> Changed the configuration to support 64bit instead of 32bit
> this in order to offload the driver from handling a wraparound.
[...]
Since you Cc'ed me, and presumably want me to review it, I'll say that
this looks like a terrible idea:
>
Changed the configuration to support 64bit instead of 32bit
this in order to offload the driver from handling a wraparound.
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Machani
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/event.c | 26 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/event.h | 19 +--
2
