On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 07:25:17PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> David Miller writes:
>
> > We don't even know if whatever "as68k" is would be the same thing
> > as GNU as and generate the same binaries.
>
> It's GNU as, likewise ld68k, though I have no idea if recent versions
> would compile
David Miller writes:
> We don't even know if whatever "as68k" is would be the same thing
> as GNU as and generate the same binaries.
It's GNU as, likewise ld68k, though I have no idea if recent versions
would compile/link the firmware (correctly). This is 15+ years old.
I don't have opinion on
From: Adam Borowski
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:33:26 +0200
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:08:12PM +0100, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Adam Borowski
>> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:24:34 +0200
>>
>> > This fixes build failure on Debian based systems: GNU as is the only m68k
>> > assembler available in
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:08:12PM +0100, David Miller wrote:
> From: Adam Borowski
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:24:34 +0200
>
> > This fixes build failure on Debian based systems: GNU as is the only m68k
> > assembler available in the archive (package binutils-m68k-linux-gnu).
> >
> > Signed-off
From: Adam Borowski
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:24:34 +0200
> This fixes build failure on Debian based systems: GNU as is the only m68k
> assembler available in the archive (package binutils-m68k-linux-gnu).
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski
The Kconfig help text for the config option controlling
This fixes build failure on Debian based systems: GNU as is the only m68k
assembler available in the archive (package binutils-m68k-linux-gnu).
Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski
---
I have no relevant hardware, thus I can't check whether the built firmware
actually works. Some opcodes are translated
