From: Zha Bin
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 16:07:03 +0800
> The vsock core only supports 32bit CID, but the Virtio-vsock spec define
> CID (dst_cid and src_cid) as u64 and the upper 32bits is reserved as
> zero. This inconsistency causes one bug in vhost vsock driver. The
> scenarios is:
>
> 0. A ha
On 2019/1/8 下午4:07, Zha Bin wrote:
The vsock core only supports 32bit CID, but the Virtio-vsock spec define
CID (dst_cid and src_cid) as u64 and the upper 32bits is reserved as
zero. This inconsistency causes one bug in vhost vsock driver. The
scenarios is:
0. A hash table (vhost_vsock_hash
Adding Peter,
is this the same problem that you reported me today?
Can you test Zha Bins patch?
Christian
On 08.01.2019 09:07, Zha Bin wrote:
> The vsock core only supports 32bit CID, but the Virtio-vsock spec define
> CID (dst_cid and src_cid) as u64 and the upper 32bits is reserved as
> zero.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:07:03PM +0800, Zha Bin wrote:
> The vsock core only supports 32bit CID, but the Virtio-vsock spec define
> CID (dst_cid and src_cid) as u64 and the upper 32bits is reserved as
> zero. This inconsistency causes one bug in vhost vsock driver. The
> scenarios is:
>
> 0. A
The vsock core only supports 32bit CID, but the Virtio-vsock spec define
CID (dst_cid and src_cid) as u64 and the upper 32bits is reserved as
zero. This inconsistency causes one bug in vhost vsock driver. The
scenarios is:
0. A hash table (vhost_vsock_hash) is used to map an CID to a vsock
obj
