On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:23 AM Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> > Could you please resend the patch addressing Dave's review comments
> > about subject line and Fixes tag?
> Yup, sorry about that. I'm not subscribed to netdev, but I thought
> replies would have me in the to:line, but I see the comments on t
> Could you please resend the patch addressing Dave's review comments
> about subject line and Fixes tag?
Yup, sorry about that. I'm not subscribed to netdev, but I thought
replies would have me in the to:line, but I see the comments on the
archive. I'll send this out shortly.
-Paul
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 6:35 PM Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:07 PM Paul Thomas wrote:
> >
> Hi All, just a reminder on this.
Could you please resend the patch addressing Dave's review comments
about subject line and Fixes tag?
Regards,
Harini
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:07 PM Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> Make sure SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (i.e. SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE) has been
> enabled for this skb It does fix the issue where normal socks that
> aren't expecting a timestamp will not wake up on select. And when a
> user does want a SOF_TIMESTAMPI
Paul, please format your patch properly.
The Subject line should be of the form:
[PATCH vX] $subsystem-prefix: Description.
Also please provide an accurate and proper Fixes: tag.
Thank you.
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:13 PM Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> Oh I notice that this is in the xilnx github repo so if it makes it in
> from there that works too.
No, I don't plan to send anything.
I just used your patch (retained your signed-off, of course) and
added the && check, because I w
Oh I notice that this is in the xilnx github repo so if it makes it in
from there that works too.
-Paul
Make sure SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (i.e. SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE) has been
enabled for this skb It does fix the issue where normal socks that
aren't expecting a timestamp will not wake up on select. And when a
user does want a SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE this does work.
Signed-off-by: Paul Thomas
--
