On 07/10/15 02:41, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:36:55PM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:58:34AM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote:
The code in net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_notify() tests for IFF_SLAV
Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:36:55PM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:58:34AM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote:
>>>The code in net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_notify() tests for IFF_SLAVE to
>>>decide if it should start the
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:58:34AM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote:
>>The code in net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_notify() tests for IFF_SLAVE to
>>decide if it should start the address configuration. Since team ports
>>shouldn't get link-local addr
Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:58:34AM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote:
>The code in net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_notify() tests for IFF_SLAVE to
>decide if it should start the address configuration. Since team ports
>shouldn't get link-local addresses assigned lets set IFF_SLAVE when linking
>a port to
The code in net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_notify() tests for IFF_SLAVE to
decide if it should start the address configuration. Since team ports
shouldn't get link-local addresses assigned lets set IFF_SLAVE when linking
a port to the team master.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck
---
drivers/net/team/tea